In later a long time, “zero-torque” or low-torque putter plans have picked up footing as producers endeavor to diminish confront turn amid the stroke (i.e., the minute the putter confront turns open/closed amid the swing) in arrange to advance a more square way and way better confront arrangement at affect. A few brands have as of now discharged devoted zero-torque models.
Golf
+1
Here are a few reasons this matters:
Reduced confront turn: If the confront remains square to the way at affect, the ball has a superior chance of rolling genuine, as contradicted to being “spun” off line. Scotty Cameron’s Senior Chief of Putter R&D, Ausbie Rollinson, said: “In the final few a long time, we’ve seen a developing number of golfers who need to minimize the feel of confront revolution in the stroke by means of putter setup.”
Golf
+1
Consistent stroke way: By setting the shaft in line with the center of gravity (CG) of the head, a few plans point to diminish torque (bending drive) through the stroke, in this way empowering a more “straight back, straight through” movement or maybe than an bend with confront revolution.
Golf Monthly
+1
Increasing request from players: As more golfers look for better control on the greens, the unobtrusive picks up from such plans ended up significant, particularly at the higher cripple or more genuine beginner levels.
However, it’s worth noticing — and Scotty’s possess documentation emphasizes this — that “zero torque” is something of a hypothetical perfect. As before long as any human puts a putter in movement (hands, wrists, etc.), a few torque definitely enters the condition. Scotty Cameron names the OC models as low-torque, not zero torque.
Scotty Cameron
+1
The OC Plan Reasoning & Specialized Highlights
What makes the OC models interesting inside the Scotty Cameron lineup? Let’s break down the key features.
Onset Center shaft placement
The title “OC” stands for Onset Center — where “Onset” alludes to the shaft being situated behind the putter head’s driving edge, and “Center” alludes to the shaft being adjusted with the head’s CG. From the brand’s announcement:
“‘Onset Center’ alludes to the putters’ shaft position, which is set back of the putter head’s driving edge (Onset) and in line with its center of gravity (Center). This tour-validated set-up minimizes torque and rearranges the putting stroke.”
Scotty Cameron
By adjusting the shaft this way, the plan points to diminish confront revolution and give more stability.
Head shape + weight + feel
The Ghost 11R OC is built on the Apparition 11 stage: a hammer, multi-material plan with “rounded corners” (the “R”) and the onset middle shaft plan.
Scotty Cameron
+1
The Studio Fashion Fastback OC proceeds the Studio Fashion Fastback ancestry (ring‐weighted mid-mallet) but includes the OC innovation bundle: shaft arrangement, negligible shaft incline, heavier head weight, etc.
Golf
+1
The OC models highlight heavier head weights, marginally stiffer shafts, and a plan predisposition toward “feel” in spite of the point of minimizing torque. For illustration, the Golf.com article famous the OC models are almost “15 g heavier” than standard Cameron models.
Golf
Face inserts/milling: Both models utilize the chain-link confront processing design that’s gotten to be a signature over Cameron’s later discharges. For the Fastback OC, there’s a Studio Carbon Steel (SCS) confront embed treated with nickel plating for vibration damping and tuned sound & feel.
Golf
+1
Shaft incline: Scotty Cameron holds fair one degree of forward shaft incline, to keep up a more conventional address appearance or maybe than the extraordinary upright or center-shaft see found in a few zero-torque littler brands.
Golf
Specs and availability
From the official site:
Lengths accessible: 33″, 34″, 35″
Stock hang: 3.5°
Stock lie: 70°
Loft/lie adjustability: ±2°
Models incorporate both RH and in a few cases LH (Ghost 11R OC alone offers LH) choices.
Scotty Cameron
+1
MSRP/Price: ~$549 USD or around £499 in UK concurring to a few sources.
Golfs
+1
Release date: November 14, 2025 (around the world) as per Scotty Cameron’s location.
Scotty Cameron
What This Implies for Scotty Cameron & the Putter Market
From a broader point of view, this discharge signals a few eminent shifts:
Scotty Cameron enters the low-torque arena
Historically, Scotty Cameron has been to some degree traditionalist in entering “trend” categories until it felt the innovation was develop and adjusted with its brand ethos. For occurrence, Golf.com notes that Cameron was one of the final major putter creators to enter the low-torque space — “doing so more than a year after competitors like Bettinardi, Toulon Golf and Odyssey.”
Golf
By propelling the OC models, Cameron recognizes the importance of the low-torque / zero-torque slant whereas still underlining that the models are “low-torque” not “zero-torque”. GolfMagic’s audit too notes: “The brand’s modern match of low-torque Onset Center putters … convey a to some degree modern take on the low-torque equation … Scotty Cameron is exceptionally cautious to underscore that these are moo, not zero torque putters.”
Golf magic
Competitive reaction & differentiation
The low-torque putter advertise has ended up swarmed, with numerous players advertising centre-shaft, offset-shaft, and genuine zero-torque plans. What Scotty Cameron brings is:
A recognizable stylish for Cameron fans (keeping the look/feel signature)
Premium development and materials (steady with Cameron’s high-end positioning)
A tempered, controlled passage into the portion (keeping up fair 1° shaft incline, heavier head, adjustability)
This permits the brand to request to its existing client base (who support Cameron’s feel & a la mode plan) whereas capturing golfers who are charmed by the low-torque benefit.
Consumer implications
For the genuine novice or touring‐amateur player, the OC models offer another alternative among premium putters. In any case, lower incapacitate players who as of now have a well-fitted conventional Cameron putter may not quickly feel the benefits — the pick up is more likely for players whose stroke tends toward confront turn or whose arrangement and consistency on the greens are conflicting due to confront angle.
Golf. Om's Jack Hirsh watches: “The putters include Cameron’s modern chain-link processing design … The way the Cameron brand works, they don’t truly need to surge into something … they need to be think and systematic approximately how they approach a particular innovation in putters.”
Golf
So from a showcase point of view, this is a vital discharge or maybe than a full‐scale “new family” upgrade — Cameron is expanding existing families (Apparition and Studio Fashion) with this “OC” option.
Who are the OC Models For?
Understanding who might advantage most from the OC putters is basic some time recently committing to one of these $500+ machines.
Ideal candidate
You might be a great fit for the OC models if:
Your stroke shows discernible confront revolution (the clubface opens or closes through affect) and you’re looking for a more square confront at impact.
You support a square-to-path stroke (straight-back, straight-through) or maybe than a huge circular segment. The plan accentuates confront control and arrangement through the shaft/CG situating.
Golf
+1
You are as of now comfortable with premium putter feel and lean toward the Scotty Cameron look/brand. The OC models do not completely forsake Cameron’s signature feel; in truth, Cameron states they centered on protecting feel in spite of the low-torque plan.
Scotty Cameron
You are willing to contribute in a high-end putter and possibly go through a fitting handle (length, lie, grasp) to advance the specifications.
Less appropriate if…
Your stroke highlights overwhelming confront turn and a expansive bend — a genuinely arc-dominant stroke might advantage more from a high-face-balance or heel-toe counterbalanced putter than a low-torque centre-shaft option.
You as of now have a well-fitted putter and are comfortable with your current execution — the incremental advantage may not legitimize the cost.
You are budget-sensitive — at ~$549 MSRP and in the high-end range of putters, this is a premium piece of equipment.
You support a articulated “traditional” hosel/topline see and don’t feel comfortable with centre-shaft/mallet styles (in spite of the fact that the OC still holds a few conventional elements).
How the Two Models Compare
Let’s compare the two modern models so you can choose which one might suit your preferences.
Model Head Sort / Shape Key Highlights
Phantom 11R OC Mallet with adjusted corners (“R”) Heavier head weight, chain-link processed confront, straight shaft in line with CG; outlined for golfers looking for soundness and negligible confront turn.
Scotty Cameron
+1
Studio Fashion Fastback OC Mid-mallet ring-weighted Incorporates the OC shaft/CG plan but inside the recognizable Studio Fashion Fastback impression; SCS embed (Studio Carbon Steel) for delicate feel, chain-link processing design.
Golf
+1
Both models share:
Onset Middle shaft placement
1° shaft lean
Availability in 33″/34″/35″ lengths (furthermore custom)
Stock hang 3.5°, lie 70°, adjustability ±2°
Custom dark KBS x Scotty Cameron shaft and Bullfighter mid-size hold with chain-link surface.
Golf
+1
Choice between them may come down to head shape/familiarity: if you’re as of now comfortable with the Apparition arrangement, the 11R OC is consistent. If you support the Studio Fashion Fastback shape or ring-weighted hammer feel, the Fastback OC is the common pick.
Strengths & Potential Weaknesses
Strengths
Feel conservation: One of the greatest reactions of early zero-torque or centre-shaft putters is misfortune of “feel” (less material criticism) or unbalanced address looks. Cameron has clearly centered on keeping up its feel legacy.
MyGolfSpy
+1
Premium construct & aesthetics: From the custom shaft, custom hold, chain-link processing, heavy-weight head, and Scotty Cameron craftsmanship, you’re getting high-end components and finish.
A refined take on moo torque: By entering the fragment after watching the early participants, Cameron has had time to refine the concept and guarantee the item adjusts with golfer desires (both feel and performance).
Versatility with adjustability: Loft/lie adjustability is kept up in spite of the non-traditional shaft situation. Cameron states that alterations won’t compromise the low-torque plan.
Golf
Potential Shortcomings / Things to Consider
Late to the advertise: A few commentary proposes that Cameron is “late” to the zero/low torque diversion. MyGolfSpy’s article comments: “It’s taken a whereas for Scotty Cameron to bring his zero-torque arrange to retail.”
MyGolfSpy
Cost: At ~$549 MSRP, this is a tall venture. For a few golfers, the incremental execution pick up may not legitimize the premium.
Learning bend: Whereas Cameron keeps the see commonplace, a few golfers transitioning to low-torque plans may still require time to alter to feel and stroke contrasts (particularly if coming from arc-style or heel-toe plans). MyGolfSpy notes that such plans can feel distinctive in stroke elements.
MyGolfSpy
Not really “zero torque”: As Cameron itself states, these are “low-torque” but not zero torque. A few perfectionists might incline toward the radical centre-shaft bored plans of other brands. Be that as it may, Cameron’s approach is more adjusted.
Golfmagic
Fit things: As with any premium putter, getting the right fitter, length, lie, grasp, and inclusion to your stroke is key. Without legitimate fit, the benefits of the OC plan may be quieted.
 Low-Torque Putters){kind=link}
0 Comments